TAP RFC [VOSI]

[Dave Morris]

On 29/09/09 16:00, Alberto Micol wrote:
>
> I know that all this was already discussed in long TAP friendly
> conversations, but now I see
> that this same concept might get extended to other Access Protocols "in
> order to provide consistent interfaces",
> and this really scares me out of my wits.
>

I agree.
If the argument is that we should make everything consistent, are we 
going suggest we add

	/sync?REQUEST=getCapabilities

to Registry or VOSpace next ?

My vote is for the REST style, and make it consistent for all of the 
IVOA services.
The VOSI endpoints were originally intended as a uniform way to GET an 
XML REpresentation of the STate of the service.

Dave