resuming progress on TAP
Guy Rixon
gtr at ast.cam.ac.uk
Tue Feb 10 02:55:06 PST 2009
On 10 Feb 2009, at 00:26, Patrick Dowler wrote:
> On Sunday 08 February 2009 19:27:19 Robert Hanisch wrote:
>> We can tweak the presentation, but it is essential, I think, to
>> present
>> ADQL and PARAM together as alternative query languages, just as Pat
>> has
>> very nicely described. ADQL is required, PARAM is optional. This
>> was
>> agreed in Trieste.
>
> One way to approach this would be to follow the same strategy that
> the VOQL
> group did when separating ADQL and TAP: we could specify the "DAL
> parameter-based query language" in a separate document that goes
> through the
> standards process. It would be usable (referenced) by all DAL
> services. The
> TAP spec would refer to the ADQL spec as a required language and
> allow for
> use of other languages.
>
> Mechanically, the TAP service metadata would have to describe which
> query
> languages and versions are supported, but we have to do that in any
> case.
This was my motivation in putting the parametric query language into
an annex in
the earlier drafts of TAP 0.31.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3006 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.ivoa.net/pipermail/dal/attachments/20090210/2651f644/attachment-0003.bin>
More information about the dal
mailing list