Applications Messaging Standard

[Alasdair Allan]

Paul Harrison wrote:
> Reading though the list, there seems to be a fair bit of  
> disagreement about the scope of this standard - why not take the  
> approach that has been taken in other areas and first define a  
> "simple" version of the protocol, which is essentially has exactly  
> the same scope as PLASTIC as it currently stands ... I think that a  
> decision to make a slightly cleaned up PLASTIC *the* Simple  
> application messaging standard would be a great benefit to the VO.

I agree with Paul, I think this would be of great benefit to everyone.

Al.