SAMP Web Profile
Pierre Fernique
Pierre.Fernique at astro.unistra.fr
Thu Dec 9 00:59:03 PST 2010
Hi all,
Not in Nara but following the SAMP discussion from Strasbourg. I tested the
Thomas' Boch VizieR prototype with success (firefox 3.6.12) . It seems that we
have a good alternative to the WebSampConnector applet
(http://vo.imcce.fr/webservices/samp///). Is there somewhere a comparison of
these two methods ?
About Web SAMP I have a question about multi-user machines. How it will works
with only one local port (21012). How can I restrict the communications only
between my applications ?
Pierre Fernique
Le 08/12/2010 16:32, Mark Taylor a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> for those of you not in Nara: in the Apps session today I made a
> presentation, based on work done by myself and Jonathan Fay, and
> funded by Microsoft Research, proposing a new SAMP profile
> (alternative to the Standard Profile) for use by web-based clients.
> You can find the presentation here:
>
> http://www.ivoa.net/cgi-bin/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/InterOpDec2010Applications
>
> and an associated web page with some additional explanation, demos,
> and a draft of the detailed documentation here:
>
> http://www.star.bristol.ac.uk/~mbt/websamp/
>
> A show of hands during the session indicated that those of the
> SAMP community present at the meeting were keen to see it taken
> forward, and moved towards becoming an IVOA standard.
> Time was relatively short during the session, so we weren't able
> to pursue much in the way of discussion of open issues.
>
> For those of you who are in Nara, if anyone would like to take the
> opportunity of colocation to discuss any such issues face to face
> I'd be happy to do so. My guess is that people won't have had
> time to look at the details enough to make a break-out meeting
> worthwhile, but if anybody disagrees get in touch and we could
> maybe do that. Obviously grab me in coffee breaks etc if you
> want to during this week, otherwise air thoughts on this list.
>
> Issues that occur to me that might benefit from more discussion are:
>
> - Security issues (already mentioned by Ray and Bob)
> - Other possibilities for cross-domain workarounds?
> - Details of the hub external URL proxying mechanism
> - Hub API details
> - Choice of port number
> - Plan for how to take the proposal forward
>
> and no doubt some things I haven't thought of.
>
> Regarding the last point, my ideas about where to go from here are
> roughly these:
>
> - I will make a public release of JSAMP including implementation of
> a hub and client conforming to the (intial draft of the) Web Profile.
> The hub will be potentially dual profile (Web Profile + Standard
> Profile), but with the Web Profile functionality deactivated by
> default. In this way most users of the new release won't see the
> new (unstable, possibly insecure) functionality, but developers
> can play with it (e.g. write clients) if they know what they are doing.
>
> - I will think about tidying up and releasing the JavaScript client
> library that underpins the Web Profile demos on the web page.
> This library works, but is not well written, so needs some
> reworking or rewriting. I'm not sure yet if I have time to do
> this in the near future.
>
> - Others (volunteers anyone?) could provide client-side implementations
> in various browser-based languages (JavaScript, either based on my
> JavaScript library or not; Flash; Silverlight; maybe somebody else
> could try to get an unsigned java applet or unsigned JNLP client
> working, which I've tried but can't make work for reasons I don't
> understand). Thomas has already started!
> It would be very good if we could have another hub implementation,
> which most likely means Luigi - he's said that he's willing to
> implement Web Profile support in SAMPy, but I don't know what
> timescale is feasible for this.
> I encourage sharing of successes and failures on the apps-samp
> mailing list. Experience using different browser configurations
> will be useful too.
>
> - With the implmentation experience gained from these activities,
> we can revise and improve as appropriate the draft specification
> that I've drafted.
>
> - Given that, we work towards the Web Profile becoming defined in a
> new section of the SAMP document, to form SAMP v1.3. Alternatively
> we could consider it as a separate document referenced from SAMP.
> Again, the timescale for this remains to be seen, but I'd hope
> we can make some progress in the first half of next year.
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Mark Taylor Astronomical Programmer Physics, Bristol University, UK
> m.b.taylor at bris.ac.uk +44-117-928-8776 http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ivoa.net/pipermail/apps-samp/attachments/20101209/ef21c650/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: domo.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 931 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.ivoa.net/pipermail/apps-samp/attachments/20101209/ef21c650/attachment-0001.gif>
More information about the apps-samp
mailing list