SAMP RFC changes

[Robert Hanisch]

Many thanks for addressing my comments so thoroughly, Mark.  Well done.

Bob

On 1/20/09 7:26 AM, "Mark Taylor" <m.b.taylor at bristol.ac.uk> wrote:

> Bob,
> 
> I have now addressed your comments from the SAMP RFC.
> I have added responses on the wiki page
> 
>     http://www.ivoa.net/cgi-bin/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/SampRfcDiscussionV11
> 
> and have made corresponding edits to the SAMP document which you can
> see in the Volute repository:
> 
>     
> http://code.google.com/p/volute/source/diff?spec=svn934&r=933&format=side&path
> =/trunk/projects/samp/doc/samp.tex&old_path=/trunk/projects/samp/doc/samp.tex&
> old=923
> 
> If there is anything you're still unhappy with, please say.
> Thanks again for your input.
> 
> The only thing which is not yet resolved is the issue of a definite
> reference to the MType list in section 5.3, as brought up by others;
> this is currently under discussion on the apps-samp list and we'll
> respond to it shortly.
> 
> This message is CC'd to the apps-samp list; I will assume that other
> authors and contributors to the document are happy with the changes
> I have made unless they say otherwise.
> 
> Mark